Перевод: с английского на все языки

со всех языков на английский

scientific mind

Толкование Перевод

1 scientific mind

научный склад ума

Большой англо-русский и русско-английский словарь > scientific mind
2 scientific mind

Общая лексика: аналитический ум

Универсальный англо-русский словарь > scientific mind
3 scientific mind

научный склад ума

Англо-русский большой универсальный переводческий словарь > scientific mind
4 scientific mind

научный склад ума

Patent terms dictionary > scientific mind
5 scientific mind

научный склад ума

Англо-русский современный словарь > scientific mind
6 scientific mind

способность к научной деятельности

Англо-русский словарь по исследованиям и ноу-хау > scientific mind
7 a truly scientific mind

Общая лексика: ум истинного ученого

Универсальный англо-русский словарь > a truly scientific mind
8 mind

mind [maɪnd]

esprit ⇒ 1 (a), 1 (b), 1 (e)-(g) attention ⇒ 1 (c) avis ⇒ 1 (h) faire attention à ⇒ 2 (a)-(c) déranger ⇒ 1 (d) garder ⇒ 2 (e) faire attention ⇒ 3 (c)

1 noun

(a) (reason) esprit m;

∎ the power of mind over matter le pouvoir de l'esprit sur la matière;

∎ to be strong in mind and body être physiquement et mentalement solide;

∎ to be of sound mind être sain d'esprit;

∎ to be/to go out of one's mind être/devenir fou(folle);

∎ are you out of your mind?, you must be out of your mind! est-ce que tu as perdu la tête?;

∎ he was out of his mind with worry il était fou d'inquiétude;

∎ he isn't in his right mind il n'a pas tous ses esprits;

∎ no one in their right mind would do such a thing aucune personne sensée n'agirait ainsi;

∎ to be bored out of one's mind mourir d'ennui

(b) (thoughts)

∎ such a thought had never entered his mind une telle pensée ne lui était jamais venue à l'esprit;

∎ there's something on her mind il y a quelque chose qui la tracasse;

∎ I have a lot on my mind j'ai beaucoup de soucis;

∎ what's going on in her mind? qu'est-ce qui se passe dans son esprit ou sa tête?;

∎ at the back of one's mind au fond de soi-même;

∎ at the back of my mind was the fear that we would arrive too late au fond de moi-même, je craignais que nous n'arrivions trop tard;

∎ to put sth to the back of one's mind chasser qch de son esprit;

∎ I just can't get him out of my mind je n'arrive absolument pas à l'oublier;

∎ to have sb/sth in mind penser à qn/qch de précis;

∎ the person I have in mind la personne à laquelle je pense;

∎ who do you have in mind for the role? à qui songez-vous pour le rôle?, qui avez-vous en vue pour le rôle?;

∎ what kind of holiday did you have in mind? qu'est-ce que tu voulais ou voudrais faire pour les vacances?;

∎ I had something smaller in mind je pensais à quelque chose de plus petit;

∎ you must put the idea out of your mind tu dois te sortir cette idée de la tête;

∎ put it out of your mind n'y pensez plus;

∎ to set one's mind on doing sth se mettre en tête de faire qch;

∎ to have one's mind set on sth vouloir qch à tout prix;

∎ a drink will take your mind off the accident bois un verre, ça te fera oublier l'accident;

∎ to put or set sb's mind at rest rassurer qn;

∎ to see things in one's mind's eye bien se représenter qch;

∎ it's all in your mind! tu te fais des idées!;

∎ it's all in the mind tout ça, c'est dans la tête

(c) (attention)

∎ to give one's whole mind to sth accorder toute son attention à qch;

∎ I can't seem to apply my mind to the problem je n'arrive pas à me concentrer sur le problème;

∎ I'm sure if you put your mind to it you could do it je suis sûr que si tu essayais vraiment, tu pourrais le faire;

∎ keep your mind on the job ne vous laissez pas distraire;

∎ your mind is not on the job tu n'as pas la tête à ce que tu fais;

∎ she does crosswords to keep her mind occupied elle fait des mots croisés pour s'occuper l'esprit;

∎ American don't pay him any mind ne fais pas attention à lui

(d) (memory)

∎ my mind has gone blank j'ai un trou de mémoire;

∎ it brings to mind the time we were in Spain cela me rappelle l'époque où nous étions en Espagne;

∎ Churchill's words come to mind on pense aux paroles de Churchill;

∎ it went clean or right out of my mind cela m'est complètement sorti de l'esprit ou de la tête;

∎ to put sb in mind of sb/sth rappeler qn/qch à qn;

∎ it puts me in mind of Japan cela me fait penser au Japon, cela me rappelle le Japon;

∎ to bear or keep sth in mind (think about) songer à qch; (take into account) tenir compte de qch; (not forget) ne pas oublier qch, garder qch à l'esprit;

∎ we must bear in mind that she is only a child il ne faut pas oublier que ce n'est qu'une enfant;

∎ I'll bear it in mind (what you suggested) je prends note;

∎ it must have slipped my mind j'ai dû oublier;

∎ familiar to have a mind like a sieve avoir (une) très mauvaise mémoire^□ ;

∎ British time out of mind I've warned him not to go there cela fait une éternité que je lui dis de ne pas y aller

(e) (intellect) esprit m;

∎ she has an outstanding mind elle est d'une très grande intelligence;

∎ he has the mind of a child il a l'esprit d'un enfant

(f) (intelligent person, thinker) esprit m, cerveau m;

∎ the great minds of our century les grands esprits ou cerveaux de notre siècle;

∎ proverb great minds think alike(, fools seldom differ) les grands esprits se rencontrent;

∎ humorous how about a drink? - great minds think alike! si on prenait une verre? - les grands esprits se rencontrent!

(g) (way of thinking)

∎ the Western mind la pensée occidentale;

∎ I haven't got a scientific mind je n'ai pas l'esprit scientifique;

∎ you've got a dirty mind! tu as l'esprit mal placé!;

∎ she has a nasty mind elle voit le mal partout;

∎ he has a suspicious mind il est soupçonneux de nature;

∎ it's probably just my suspicious mind but I don't trust him c'est probablement que je suis trop suspicieux ou soupçonneux, mais je n'ai pas confiance en lui

(h) (opinion)

∎ to be of the same or of like or of one mind être du même avis;

∎ they're all of one or the same mind ils sont tous d'accord ou du même avis;

∎ to know one's own mind savoir ce qu'on veut;

∎ you've got a mind of your own tu peux décider toi-même;

∎ the car seemed to have a mind of its own la voiture semblait faire ce que bon lui semblait;

∎ to my mind,… à mon avis,…, selon moi,…;

∎ I'm in two minds about where to go for my holidays je ne sais pas très bien où aller passer mes vacances;

∎ I'm in two minds about going je ne sais pas si je vais y aller;

∎ to make up one's mind se décider, prendre une décision;

∎ make up your mind! décidez-vous!;

∎ I can't make up your mind for you je ne peux pas décider à ta place;

∎ my mind is made up ma décision est prise;

∎ to make up one's mind about sth décider qch;

∎ to make up one's mind to do sth se décider à faire qch;

∎ she's made up her mind to move house elle s'est résolue à déménager

(i) (desire)

∎ I've half a mind to give up j'ai presque envie de renoncer;

∎ I've a good mind to tell him what I think j'ai bien envie de lui dire ce que je pense

(j) (intention)

∎ nothing was further from my mind je n'en avais nullement l'intention;

∎ I've had it in mind for some time now j'y songe depuis un moment

2 transitive verb

(a) (pay attention to) faire attention à;

∎ he didn't mind my advice il n'a pas fait attention à ou n'a pas écouté mes conseils;

∎ mind your own business! occupe-toi de ce qui te regarde!, mêle-toi de tes oignons!;

∎ mind your language! surveille ton langage!;

∎ to mind one's manners se surveiller;

∎ mind the step (sign) attention à la marche;

∎ mind the cat! attention au chat!;

∎ mind what you say (pay attention) réfléchissez à ou faites attention à ce que vous dites; (don't be rude) mesurez vos paroles;

∎ mind what you're doing! regarde ce que tu fais!;

∎ would you mind where you're putting your feet, please? est-ce que tu peux faire attention où tu mets les pieds, s'il te plaît?;

∎ British familiar mind how you go! fais attention à toi!

(b) (be sure that) faire attention à;

∎ mind you write to him! n'oubliez pas de lui écrire!;

∎ mind you don't fall! faites attention de ne pas tomber!;

∎ mind you don't forget n'oubliez surtout pas;

∎ mind you don't break it fais bien attention de ne pas le casser;

∎ mind you're not late! faites en sorte de ne pas être en retard!;

∎ mind you post my letter n'oubliez surtout pas de poster ma lettre

(c) (concern oneself with) faire attention à, s'inquiéter de ou pour;

∎ don't mind me, I'll just sit here quietly ne vous inquiétez pas de moi, je vais m'asseoir ici et je ne dérangerai personne;

∎ don't mind him, he's always like that ne fais pas attention à lui, il est toujours comme ça;

∎ ironic don't mind me, I only live here! je t'en prie, fais comme chez toi!;

∎ I really don't mind what he says/thinks je me fiche de ce qu'il peut dire/penser

(d) (object to)

∎ I don't mind him il ne me dérange pas;

∎ I don't mind the cold le froid ne me gêne pas;

∎ I don't mind trying je veux bien essayer;

∎ you don't mind me using the car, do you? - I mind very much cela ne te dérange pas que je prenne la voiture? - cela me dérange beaucoup;

∎ do you mind going out when the weather's cold? est-ce que cela vous ennuie de sortir quand il fait froid?;

∎ do you mind me smoking? cela ne vous ennuie ou dérange pas que je fume?;

∎ did you mind me inviting her? tu aurais peut-être préféré que je ne l'invite pas?, ça t'ennuie que je l'aie invitée?;

∎ would you mind turning out the light, please? est-ce que tu peux éteindre la lumière, s'il te plaît?;

∎ how much do you earn, if you don't mind my or me asking? combien est-ce que vous gagnez, sans indiscrétion?;

∎ I wouldn't mind having his salary ça ne me dérangerait pas de gagner autant que lui;

∎ I wouldn't mind a cup of tea je prendrais bien ou volontiers une tasse de thé

(e) (look after → children) garder; (→ bags, possessions) garder, surveiller; (→ shop, business) garder, tenir; (→ plants, garden) s'occuper de, prendre soin de;

∎ can you mind the house for us while we're away? (watch) pouvez-vous surveiller la maison pendant notre absence?; (look after) pouvez-vous vous occuper de la maison pendant notre absence?

(f) Scottish (remember) se rappeler, se souvenir de

(g) (idioms)

∎ mind (you), I'm not surprised remarque ou tu sais, cela ne m'étonne pas;

∎ mind you, he's a bit young ceci dit, il est un peu jeune;

∎ mind you, I've always thought he was a bit strange remarquez, j'ai toujours trouvé qu'il était un peu bizarre;

∎ but, mind you, it was late mais, voyez-vous, il était tard;

∎ never mind that now (leave it) ne vous occupez pas de cela tout de suite; (forget it) ce n'est plus la peine de s'en occuper;

∎ never mind the consequences ne vous préoccupez pas des conséquences, peu importent les conséquences;

∎ never mind what people say/think peu importe ce que disent/pensent les gens;

∎ never mind his feelings, I've got a business to run! je me moque de ses états d'âme, j'ai une entreprise à diriger!;

∎ never mind him, just run for it! ne t'occupe pas de lui, fonce!

3 intransitive verb

(a) (object → in requests)

∎ do you mind if I open the window? cela vous dérange si j'ouvre la fenêtre?;

∎ would you mind if I opened the window? est-ce que cela vous dérangerait si j'ouvrais la fenêtre?;

∎ do you mind if I smoke? est-ce que cela vous gêne ou dérange que je fume?;

∎ I don't mind in the least cela ne me dérange pas le moins du monde;

∎ if you don't mind si vous voulez bien, si vous n'y voyez pas d'inconvénient;

∎ I can't say I really mind je ne peux pas dire que cela m'ennuie ou me dérange vraiment;

∎ do you mind if I take the car? - of course I don't mind est-ce que cela vous ennuie que je prenne la voiture? - bien sûr que non;

∎ familiar I don't mind if I do (in reply to offer) je ne dis pas non, ce n'est pas de refus

(b) (care, worry)

∎ I don't mind if people laugh at me - but you should mind! je ne me soucie guère que les gens se moquent de moi - mais vous devriez!;

∎ if you don't mind, I haven't finished si cela ne vous fait rien, je n'ai pas terminé;

∎ do you mind? (politely) vous permettez?;

∎ ironic do you mind! (indignantly) non mais!;

∎ never mind (it doesn't matter) cela ne fait rien, tant pis; (don't worry) ne vous en faites pas;

∎ never you mind! (don't worry) ne vous en faites pas!; (mind your own business) ce n'est pas votre affaire!;

∎ never mind about the money now ne t'en fais pas pour l'argent, on verra plus tard

(c) British (be careful) faire attention;

∎ mind when you cross the road fais attention en traversant la route;

∎ mind! attention!

►► mind reader voyant(e) m,f;

∎ he must be a mind reader il lit dans les pensées comme dans un livre;

∎ I'm not a mind reader je ne suis pas devin;

Marketing mind share part f de notoriété

➲ mind out intransitive verb

British faire attention;

∎ mind out! attention!;

∎ mind out for the rocks! attention aux rochers!

Un panorama unique de l'anglais et du français > mind
9 mind

maɪnd
1. сущ.
1) а) разум;
умственные способности;
ум on one's mind ≈ в мыслях, на уме out of one's mind ≈ помешанный, не в своем уме to be in one's right mind ≈ быть в здравом уме to bear, keep smth. in mind ≈ иметь что-л. в виду to cross one's mind ≈ приходить в голову to cultivate, develop one's mind ≈ развивать/совершенствовать свои способности to keep one's mind on smth. ≈ не переставая думать о чем-л. to live with one's own mind ≈ жить своим умом to put, set one's mind to smth. ≈ решить что-л. to set one's mind at ease ≈ успокоиться to take one's mind off smth. ≈ перестать думать о чем-л. the great minds of the world ≈ великие умы человечества to lose one's mind ≈ потерять голову, сойти с ума clear mind ≈ ясная голова closed mind ≈ ограниченность disciplined mind ≈ дисциплинированный ум open mind ≈ открытый, восприимчивый ум scientific mind ≈ научный склад ума sound mind ≈ здравый ум Syn: head, intellect, intelligence, reason б) мышление, умственная деятельность
2) а) память;
воспоминание Keep that in mind. ≈ Сохрани это в памяти. to bring to mind, call to mind ≈ напомнить to have in mind, bear in mind, keep in mind ≈ помнить, иметь в виду to be out of mind, go out of mind, pass out of mind ≈ выскочить из памяти, быть забытым time out of mind ≈ с незапамятных времен within time of mind, time within mind of man ≈ в пределах человеческой памяти put smb. in mind Syn: recollection, remembrance, memory б) уст. церемония в память о чем-л.;
поминание Syn: commemoration, memorial
1.
3) мнение, взгляд, точка зрения to be of one/a mind with smb., to be of smb.'s mind ≈ быть одного и того же мнения с кем-л. to be of the same mind ≈ быть единодушным, придерживаться одного мнения;
оставаться при своем мнении to give smb. a piece of one's mind ≈ высказывать кому-л. свое мнение to have an open mind ≈ быть объективным, непредубежденным to read smb.'s mind ≈ читать чужие мысли to speak one's mind, to tell (a person) one's mind, to let (a person) know one's mind ≈ высказать свою точку зрения, высказать все откровенно to my mind ≈ по моему мнению Syn: opinion, view
1., judgement
4) желание, намерение, склонность (сделать что-л.) ;
преим. во фразах: change one's mind make up one's mind make up one's mind to be in two minds be in twenty minds have half a mind have a good mind have a great mind know one's own mind Syn: intention, purpose
1., desire
1.
5) настроение, расположение духа state of mind Syn: disposition
1., mood I, inclination
6) дух (душа) deep in one's mind ≈ (глубоко) в душе mind's eye ≈ духовное око, мысленный взгляд
7) (Mind) церк. Бог ∙ many men, many minds, no two minds think alike ≈ сколько голов, столько умов out of sight, out of mind посл. ≈ с глаз долой - из сердца вон
2. гл.
1) а) редк. напоминать Syn: remind б) арх. или диал. помнить Syn: remember
2) заниматься, выполнять;
присматривать за (кем/чем-л.) to mind the shop ≈ присматривать за лавкой Please mind the fire. ≈ Пожалуйста, последите за камином. Mind your own business. ≈ Занимайся своим делом.
3) а) следить, обращать внимание Mind your manners. ≈ Следите за своими манерами. б) слушаться( кого-л.), прислушиваться( к кому-л.) Mind your parends. ≈ Слушай своих родителей. Syn: obey
4) а) беспокоиться, быть озабоченным, тревожиться Never mind your mistake. ≈ Не беспокойтесь об ошибке. б) возражать, иметь что-л. против( в вопр. или отриц. предложении, а также в утверд. ответе) I don't mind if you go. ≈ Я не против того, чтобы ты пошел. She doesn't mind the cold. ≈ Она ничего не имеет против холода. I wouldn't mind a cup of tea. ≈ Не откажусь от чашки чая. Do you mind my smoking? ≈ Вы не будете возражать, если я закурю? I don't mind it a bit. ≈ Нет, нисколько. Yes, I mind it very much. ≈ Нет, я очень против этого. I shouldn't mind ≈ я не прочь Syn: object II
5) а) быть внимательным, аккуратным;
не забыть выполнить (дела, обязанности и т. п.) Mind you finish it. ≈ Не забудь закончить это. Mind you're not late. ≈ Смотрите, не опоздайте. б) беречься, оберегаться, остерегаться Mind the broken glass. ≈ Остерегайся разбитого стекла. ум, разум - to enter /to cross, to come into/ one's * прийти на ум /в голову/, осенить - his * was filled with sad thoughts его одолевали печальные мысли - on one's * на уме, в мыслях - she has smth. on her * у нее что-то на уме;
ее что-то тревожит - what have you in *? что ты собираешься сделать?;
что у тебя на уме?;
что ты имеешь в виду? - it preys on my * это меня угнетает /тяготит/ - to get smth. into one's * забрать себе что-л. в голову;
понять что-л. - to get smth. out of one's * выбросить что-л. из головы - to have /to get/ smth. off one's * перестать думать о чем-л.;
избавиться от мыслей о чем-л. - to poison smb.'s * against smb. настроить кого-л. против кого-л. - where's my *? (разговорное) о чем я думаю? умственные способности, интеллект, ум;
мышление, умственная деятельность - * game интеллектуальная игра - a pedestrian * посредственность - to possess unusual powers of * обладать недюжинным умом /недюжинными способностями/ - the great *s of our age великие умы нашего времени - I don't understand how his * works я не понимаю ход его мыслей - he has a very good * он очень способный (человек) рассудок, ум - presence of * присутствие духа, хладнокровие - to be of sound *, to be sound in *, to be in one's right * быть в здравом уме - to be clear in one's own * ясно представлять себе, отдавать себе ясный отчет - to be out of one's (right) * быть не в своем уме;
быть сумасшедшим;
сходить с ума, быть в отчаянии /вне себя/ - you must be out of your *! вы с ума сошли! - she was out of her * with grief она сходила с ума от горя - to go out of one's * сходить с ума;
терять рассудок - his * has gone, he has lost his * он не в своем уме - to drive /to send/ smb. out of his * сводить кого-л. с ума;
доводить кого-л. до сумасшествия память - absence of * забывчивость;
рассеянность - to bear /to keep/ in * помнить;
запоминать;
иметь в виду - bear that in *! запомни это!;
имей это в виду! - with present-day conditions in * учитывая сегодняшнюю действительность, имея в виду условия современной жизни - to bring /to call/ to * вспоминать, припоминать;
воскрешать в памяти;
напоминать - I called his words to * я вспомнил его слова - this brings to * another story это (мне) напоминает еще один /другой/ случай - to put smb. in * of smth. напоминать кому-л. о чем-л. - he puts me in * of his father он напоминает мне своего отца - to cast one's * back вспомнить прошлое /былое/ - to go /to pass/ out of (one's) *, to slip one's * быть забытым;
выскочить из головы - it went clean out of my * (разговорное) я начисто забыл об этом - to put /to get/ smth. out of (one's) * забыть что-л. - time out of * незапамятные времена;
испокон веку( устаревшее) поминание;
поминальная служба настроение, состояние духа - cheerful * хорошее настроение - peace of * спокойствие духа - I was easy in my * у меня было спокойно на душе - in a good state /frame/ of * в хорошем настроении, расположении направление мыслей;
склад ума - reactionary * реакционные /консервативные/ взгляды /убеждения/ (откровенное) мнение;
взгляд - to speak one's * (out) откровенно высказываться - to tell smb. one's *, to let smb. know one's * откровенно высказать кому-л. свое мнение или неодобрение - I gave him a piece of my * (разговорное) я ему высказал все, что думал - to be of smb.'s *, to be of the same * as smb. быть одного мнения с кем-л., придерживаться того же мнения - they were all of one * все они придерживались одного мнения, они достигли единодушного решения;
они пришли к соглашению - with one * единодушно - to be of the same * быть единодушным, придерживаться одного мнения;
оставаться при своем мнении - to keep an open * on smth. сохранять объективность в подходе к вопросу, делу - to have an open * быть непредубежденным - meeting of *s (американизм) соглашение, единство взглядов - to smb.'s * по чьему-л. мнению - to my * you are right по-моему, ты прав;
на мой взгляд, ты прав намерение, желание - to have a * to do smth. иметь намерение /быть склонным/ сделать что-л. - to have a good /a great/ * to do smth. очень хотеть что-л. сделать - I have a great * to speak to him вот возьму да и поговорю с ним - to have half a * to do smth. быть не прочь /быть склонным/ что-л. сделать - to know one's own * не колебаться, твердо знать, чего хочешь - he doesn't know his own * он сам не знает, чего (он) хочет - to change /to alter/ one's * передумать, изменить свое решение /свои намерения/ - to be in /of/ two *s быть /находиться/ в нерешительности, колебаться;
не знать на что решиться - to smb.'s * в соответствии с чьими-л. желаниями;
по чьему-л. вкусу мысли, думы;
стремление, помыслы - to set one's * on smth. очень хотеть чего-л.;
сосредоточить все свои помыслы на чем-л.;
поставить себе какую-л. цель - he has set his * on becoming an engineer он твердо решил стать инженером - my * was (set) on other things я думал о других вещах - to give /to turn/ one's * to smth. обратить свое внимание на что-л.;
сосредоточить свои мысли /помыслы/ на чем-л.;
приложить старания к чему-л. - to keep one's * on smth. все время думать о чем-л.;
сосредоточить свое внимание на чем-л. - you must keep your * on your work ты должен все время думать о своей работе - he turned his * to his work он сосредоточился на своей работе - to read smb.'s * читать чужие мысли - to be on smb.'s * поглощать чье-л. внимание - to take one's * off smth. перестать думать о чем-л. - to take smb.'s * off smth. отвлекать чье-л. внимание от чего-л. - it took her * off her troubles это отвлекло ее от забот /от переживаний/ - to bring one's * to bear on smth. обратить свое внимание на что-л. - I set his * at rest я его успокоил дух;
душа - * and body душа и тело - the *'s eye мысленный взгляд, воображение > to make up one's * решиться;
принять решение > to make up one's * to smth. смириться с чем-л. > so many men so many *s (пословица) сколько голов, столько умов > a sound * in a sound body( пословица) в здоровом теле здоровый дух > out of sight, out of * (пословица) с глаз долой - из сердца вон в вопросительных или отрицательных предложениях, а также в утвердительном ответе возражать, иметь (что-л.) против - if you don't * если вы не возражаете - do you * if I smoke?, do you * my smoking?, would you * my smoking? вы не будете возражать, если я закурю? - no, I don't * (it) нет, я не возражаю /ничего не имею против/ - yes, I * it (very much) нет, я (решительно) возражаю - I shouldn't * a cup of tea я не прочь выпить чашку чаю - would you * ringing? будьте любезны, позвоните;
не будете ли вы так любезны позвонить? - would you * holding your tongue? попридержи свой язык, пожалуйста заботиться;
волноваться, беспокоиться, тревожиться - he *s your attitude very much его очень волнует ваше отношение - I do not * what you do мне все равно, что вы сделаете - he doesn't * the cold weather холодная погода ему нипочем - I don't * what people say меня не волнует, что говорят люди обыкн. в повелительном предложении обращать внимание, считаться( с чем-л.) - don't * me не обращайте внимания на меня - never * him не обращайте на него внимания - never * the expense не останавливайтесь перед расходами обыкн. в повелительном предложении прислушиваться (к советам и т. п.) ;
слушаться - the dog *s his master собака слушается своего хозяина - * what I say (внимательно) слушай, что я говорю - if he had *ed me если бы он меня послушал - * and do what you are told слушайся и изволь делать то, что тебе говорят обыкн. в повелительном предложении остерегаться, беречься, обращать внимание - * the step! осторожно! ступенька! - * the dog берегись собаки - * your health береги свое здоровье - * what you are doing! осторожнее! - * your language! выражайтесь повежливее! обыкн. в повелительном предложении не забыть сделать (что-л.) - * you write не забудь(те) написать - * you don't forget смотри не забудь - * you bring the book (смотрите) не забудьте принести книгу обыкн. в повелительном предложении обратить внимание, заметить - I have no objection, * (you), but... я не возражаю, заметь, но... - not a word, *! помните, никому ни слова! заботиться (о чем-л., ком-л.) ;
смотреть, присматривать ( за чем-л., кем-л.) ;
заниматься (чем-л.) - to * the baby присматривать за ребенком - to * one's business заниматься своим делом - * your own business! не вмешивайся в чужие дела! - I asked him if he'd * my bags я попросил его присмотреть за моими чемоданами (устаревшее) (диалектизм) помнить (редкое) напоминать (устаревшее) внимательно следить, внимать( устаревшее) (диалектизм) намереваться > never *! не волнуйся, не обращай внимания!, стоит ли беспокоиться!;
ничего!, все равно!, не беда!;
это несущественно!;
не твое дело! > where have you been? - Never you *! где вы были? - Не ваша забота /печаль/ > to * one's P's and Q's следить за собой, за своими словами, соблюдать осторожность или приличия > * your eye! держи ухо востро!, берегись!, гляди в оба! ~ разум;
умственные способности;
ум;
to be in one's right mind быть в здравом уме;
out of one's mind помешанный, не в своем уме to know one's own ~ не колебаться, твердо знать, чего хочешь;
to be in two minds колебаться, находиться в нерешительности ~ мнение;
мысль;
взгляд;
to be of one (или а) mind (with) быть одного и того же мнения (с) to be of the same ~ быть единодушным, придерживаться одного мнения to be of the same ~ оставаться при своем мнении;
to speak one's mind говорить откровенно;
to change (или to alter) one's mind передумать;
to my mind по моему мнению to bring to ~ напомнить do you ~ my smoking? вы не будете возражать, если я закурю?;
I don't mind it a bit нет, нисколько to go (или to pass) out of ~ выскочить из памяти to live with one's own ~ жить своим умом;
the great minds of the world великие умы человечества;
on one's mind в мыслях, на уме to have an open ~ быть объективным, непредубежденным ~ память;
воспоминание;
to have (или to bear, to keep) in mind помнить, иметь в виду do you ~ my smoking? вы не будете возражать, если я закурю?;
I don't mind it a bit нет, нисколько ~ намерение, желание;
I have a great (или good) mind to do it у меня большое желание это сделать yes, I ~ it very much нет, я очень против этого;
I shouldn't mind я не прочь yes, I ~ it very much нет, я очень против этого;
I shouldn't mind я не прочь it was not to his ~ это было ему не по вкусу to know one's own ~ не колебаться, твердо знать, чего хочешь;
to be in two minds колебаться, находиться в нерешительности to live with one's own ~ жить своим умом;
the great minds of the world великие умы человечества;
on one's mind в мыслях, на уме to make up one's ~ решить(ся) to make up one's ~ (to smth.) смириться (с чем-л.) many men, many minds, no two minds think alike = сколько голов, столько умов many men, many minds, no two minds think alike = сколько голов, столько умов mind беспокоиться ~ (в вопр. или отриц. предложении, а также в утверд. ответе) возражать, иметь (что-л.) против ~ дух (душа) ;
mind's eye духовное око, мысленный взгляд;
deep in one's mind (глубоко) в душе ~ заботиться, заниматься (чем-л.) ;
смотреть (за чем-л.) ;
to mind the shop присматривать за лавкой;
please mind the fire пожалуйста, последите за камином ~ заботиться ~ мнение;
мысль;
взгляд;
to be of one (или а) mind (with) быть одного и того же мнения (с) ~ намерение, желание;
I have a great (или good) mind to do it у меня большое желание это сделать ~ остерегаться, беречься;
mind the step! осторожно, там ступенька! ~ память;
воспоминание;
to have (или to bear, to keep) in mind помнить, иметь в виду ~ помнить;
mind our agreement не забудьте о нашем соглашении;
mind and do what you're told не забудьте сделать то, что вам велели ~ присматривать ~ психическое здоровье ~ разум;
умственные способности;
ум;
to be in one's right mind быть в здравом уме;
out of one's mind помешанный, не в своем уме ~ рассудок ~ помнить;
mind our agreement не забудьте о нашем соглашении;
mind and do what you're told не забудьте сделать то, что вам велели to ~ one's P's and Q's следить за собой, за своими словами, соблюдать осторожность или приличия;
mind your eye! = держи ухо востро! ~ помнить;
mind our agreement не забудьте о нашем соглашении;
mind and do what you're told не забудьте сделать то, что вам велели ~ заботиться, заниматься (чем-л.) ;
смотреть (за чем-л.) ;
to mind the shop присматривать за лавкой;
please mind the fire пожалуйста, последите за камином ~ остерегаться, беречься;
mind the step! осторожно, там ступенька! to ~ one's P's and Q's следить за собой, за своими словами, соблюдать осторожность или приличия;
mind your eye! = держи ухо востро! ~ дух (душа) ;
mind's eye духовное око, мысленный взгляд;
deep in one's mind (глубоко) в душе to be of the same ~ оставаться при своем мнении;
to speak one's mind говорить откровенно;
to change (или to alter) one's mind передумать;
to my mind по моему мнению never ~ ничего, неважно, не беспокойтесь, не беда never ~ the cost (или the expense) не останавливайтесь перед расходами many men, many minds, no two minds think alike = сколько голов, столько умов of sound ~ в здравом уме of unsound ~ душевнобольной unsound: ~ нездоровый, больной;
болезненный;
of unsound mind сумасшедший, душевнобольной to live with one's own ~ жить своим умом;
the great minds of the world великие умы человечества;
on one's mind в мыслях, на уме ~ разум;
умственные способности;
ум;
to be in one's right mind быть в здравом уме;
out of one's mind помешанный, не в своем уме ~ заботиться, заниматься (чем-л.) ;
смотреть (за чем-л.) ;
to mind the shop присматривать за лавкой;
please mind the fire пожалуйста, последите за камином to read (smb.'s) ~ читать чужие мысли read: to ~ (smb.'s) mind (или thoughts) читать чужие мысли;
to read (smb.'s) hand (или palm) гадать по руке to be of the same ~ оставаться при своем мнении;
to speak one's mind говорить откровенно;
to change (или to alter) one's mind передумать;
to my mind по моему мнению split ~ = split personality split ~ = split personality personality: split ~ раздвоение личности

Большой англо-русский и русско-английский словарь > mind
10 mind

[maɪnd] 1. сущ.
1)

а) разум; умственные способности; ум

mind of great capacity — глубокий ум

the great minds of the world — великие умы человечества

in one's mind — в уме

on one's mind — в мыслях, на уме

out of one's mind — помешанный, не в своём уме

to be in one's right mind — быть в здравом уме

to cross one's mind — приходить в голову

to cultivate / develop one's mind — развивать, совершенствовать свои способности

to keep one's mind on smth. — думать о чём-л., не переставая

to live with one's own mind — жить своим умом

to put / set one's mind to smth. — решить что-л.

to set one's mind at ease — успокоиться

to take one's mind off smth. — перестать думать о чём-л.

clear mind — ясная голова

closed mind — ограниченность

disciplined mind — дисциплинированный ум

open mind — объективность, беспристрастность

scientific mind — научный склад ума

sound mind — здравый ум

to lose one's mind — потерять голову, сойти с ума

in the mind's eye — в воображении, мысленно

Syn:

head, intellect, intelligence, reason

б) мышление, умственная деятельность

2)

а) память; воспоминание

to bring /call to mind — напомнить

to bear / have/ keep / in mind — помнить, вспоминать; иметь в виду

Keep that in mind. — Сохрани это в памяти.

to be / go / pass out of mind — выскочить из памяти, быть забытым

time out of mind — с незапамятных времен

within time of mind, time within mind of man — в пределах человеческой памяти

- put smb. in mind

Syn:

recollection, remembrance, memory

б) уст. церемония в память о чём-л.; поминание

Syn:

commemoration, memorial 1.

3) мнение, взгляд, точка зрения

to my mind — по моему мнению

to be of one / a mind with smb., to be of smb.'s mind — быть одного и того же мнения с кем-л.

to have an open mind — быть объективным, непредубеждённым

to read smb.'s mind — читать чужие мысли

to speak one's mind, to tell smb. one's mind, to let smb. know one's mind — откровенно, без обиняков высказать свою точку зрения

- be of the same mind

Syn:

opinion, view 1., judgement

4) желание, намерение, склонность

- change one's mind
- make up one's mind
- make up one's mind to smth.
- be in two minds, be in twenty minds
- have half a mind, have a good mind, have a great mind
- know one's own mind
- piece of one's mind
Syn:

intention, purpose 1., desire 1.

5) настроение, расположение духа

- state of mind

Syn:

disposition 1., mood I, inclination

6) дух, душа

deep in one's mind — (глубоко) в душе, в сердце

mind's eye — духовное око; мысленный взгляд

••

Many men, many minds. / No two minds think alike. посл. — Сколько голов, столько умов.; Сколько людей, столько и мнений.

Out of sight, out of mind. посл. — С глаз долой - из сердца вон.
2. гл.
1) заботиться (о ком-л. / чём-л.); смотреть, присматривать (за кем / чем-л.); заниматься (чем-л.)

to mind the shop — присматривать за лавкой

Please mind the fire. — Пожалуйста, последите за камином.

Mind your own business. — Занимайся своим делом.

2)

а) следить, обращать внимание

Mind your manners. — Следите за своими манерами.

б) слушаться (кого-л.), прислушиваться (к кому-л.)

Mind your parents. — Слушай своих родителей.

Syn:

obey

3)

а) беспокоиться, тревожиться

Never mind your mistake. — Не беспокойтесь о своей ошибке.

б) возражать, иметь что-л. против (в вопросительном или отрицательном предложении, а также в утвердительном ответе)

I don't mind if you go. — Я не против, если ты пойдёшь.

I shouldn't mind marrying. — Я не прочь жениться.

She doesn't mind the cold. — Она не обращает внимания на холод.

I wouldn't mind a cup of tea. — Не откажусь от чашки чая.

Do you mind my smoking? — Вы не возражаете, если я закурю?

I don't mind it a bit. — Нет, нисколько.

Yes, I mind it very much. — Нет, я очень против этого.

Syn:

object II

4)

а) быть внимательным, аккуратным; не забыть выполнить

Mind you finish it. — Не забудь закончить это.

Mind you're not late. — Смотрите, не опоздайте.

б) беречься, остерегаться

Mind the broken glass. — Осторожно, битое стекло!

5)

а) шотл. напоминать

Syn:

remind

б) уст.; диал. помнить

Syn:

remember

Англо-русский современный словарь > mind
11 scientific

[͵saıənʹtıfık] a
1. научный

scientific attitude - научный подход

scientific classification - научная классификация

scientific film - научный кинофильм

scientific literature - (естественно-)научная литература

scientific method [principle] - научный метод [принцип]

scientific men - учёные; люди науки

a truly scientific mind - ум истинного учёного

2. спорт.

1) высокого класса, техничный

scientific boxing - а) игровой бокс; б) бокс высокого класса

2) хорошо натренированный, ловкий

НБАРС > scientific
12 mind

1) ум, разум; рассудок

2) умственные способности; интеллект

3) мышление; направление мыслей; склад ума

4) мнение; точка зрения; намерение; стремление

•

- clear mind
- closed mind
- fertile mind
- open mind
- scientific mind
- sound mind

Patent terms dictionary > mind
13 scientific

ˌsaɪənˈtɪfɪk прил.
1) научный
2) спорт. высокого класса, техничный научный - * attitude научный подход - * classification научная классификация - * film научный кинофильм - * literature( естественно-) научная литература - * method научный метод - * men ученые;
люди науки - a truly * mind ум истинного ученого (спортивное) высокого класса, техничный - * boxing игровой бокс;
бокс высокого класса хорошо натренированный, ловкий scientific высокого класса (о спортсмене) ~ научный

Большой англо-русский и русско-английский словарь > scientific
14 (a) scientific habit of mind

a scientific (cheerful, original) habit of mind научный (оптимистический, оригинальный) склад ума

English-Russian combinatory dictionary > (a) scientific habit of mind
15 exert a hold on mind

Общая лексика: пленять ум (англ. цитата заимствована из кн.: Kuhn T.S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions)

Универсальный англо-русский словарь > exert a hold on mind
16 give (one's) mind whole to scientific research

Макаров: полностью посвятить себя научным изысканиям

Универсальный англо-русский словарь > give (one's) mind whole to scientific research
17 give mind wholly to scientific research

Общая лексика: полностью посвятить себя научным изысканиям

Универсальный англо-русский словарь > give mind wholly to scientific research
18 give mind whole to scientific research

Макаров: (one's) полностью посвятить себя научным изысканиям

Универсальный англо-русский словарь > give mind whole to scientific research
19 Bibliography

■ Aitchison, J. (1987). Noam Chomsky: Consensus and controversy. New York: Falmer Press.

■ Anderson, J. R. (1980). Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

■ Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

■ Anderson, J. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.

■ Archilochus (1971). In M. L. West (Ed.), Iambi et elegi graeci (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

■ Armstrong, D. M. (1990). The causal theory of the mind. In W. G. Lycan (Ed.), Mind and cognition: A reader (pp. 37-47). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell. (Originally published in 1981 in The nature of mind and other essays, Ithaca, NY: University Press).

■ Atkins, P. W. (1992). Creation revisited. Oxford: W. H. Freeman & Company.

■ Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

■ Bacon, F. (1878). Of the proficience and advancement of learning divine and human. In The works of Francis Bacon (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Hurd & Houghton.

■ Bacon, R. (1928). Opus majus (Vol. 2). R. B. Burke (Trans.). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

■ Bar-Hillel, Y. (1960). The present status of automatic translation of languages. In F. L. Alt (Ed.), Advances in computers (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.

■ Barr, A., & E. A. Feigenbaum (Eds.) (1981). The handbook of artificial intelligence (Vol. 1). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

■ Barr, A., & E. A. Feigenbaum (Eds.) (1982). The handbook of artificial intelligence (Vol. 2). Los Altos, CA: William Kaufman.

■ Barron, F. X. (1963). The needs for order and for disorder as motives in creative activity. In C. W. Taylor & F. X. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its rec ognition and development (pp. 153-160). New York: Wiley.

■ Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

■ Bartley, S. H. (1969). Principles of perception. London: Harper & Row.

■ Barzun, J. (1959). The house of intellect. New York: Harper & Row.

■ Beach, F. A., D. O. Hebb, C. T. Morgan & H. W. Nissen (Eds.) (1960). The neu ropsychology of Lashley. New York: McGraw-Hill.

■ Berkeley, G. (1996). Principles of human knowledge: Three Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Originally published in 1710.)

■ Berlin, I. (1953). The hedgehog and the fox: An essay on Tolstoy's view of history. NY: Simon & Schuster.

■ Bierwisch, J. (1970). Semantics. In J. Lyons (Ed.), New horizons in linguistics. Baltimore: Penguin Books.

■ Black, H. C. (1951). Black's law dictionary. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.

■ Bloom, A. (1981). The linguistic shaping of thought: A study in the impact of language on thinking in China and the West. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

■ Bobrow, D. G., & D. A. Norman (1975). Some principles of memory schemata. In D. G. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding: Stud ies in Cognitive Science (pp. 131-149). New York: Academic Press.

■ Boden, M. A. (1977). Artificial intelligence and natural man. New York: Basic Books.

■ Boden, M. A. (1981). Minds and mechanisms. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

■ Boden, M. A. (1990a). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London: Cardinal.

■ Boden, M. A. (1990b). The philosophy of artificial intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

■ Boden, M. A. (1994). Precis of The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. Behavioral and brain sciences 17, 519-570.

■ Boden, M. (1996). Creativity. In M. Boden (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.

■ Bolter, J. D. (1984). Turing's man: Western culture in the computer age. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

■ Bolton, N. (1972). The psychology of thinking. London: Methuen.

■ Bourne, L. E. (1973). Some forms of cognition: A critical analysis of several papers. In R. Solso (Ed.), Contemporary issues in cognitive psychology (pp. 313324). Loyola Symposium on Cognitive Psychology (Chicago 1972). Washington, DC: Winston.

■ Bransford, J. D., N. S. McCarrell, J. J. Franks & K. E. Nitsch (1977). Toward unexplaining memory. In R. Shaw & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 431-466). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

■ Breger, L. (1981). Freud's unfinished journey. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

■ Brehmer, B. (1986). In one word: Not from experience. In H. R. Arkes & K. Hammond (Eds.), Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 705-719). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

■ Bresnan, J. (1978). A realistic transformational grammar. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan & G. A. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 1-59). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

■ Brislin, R. W., W. J. Lonner & R. M. Thorndike (Eds.) (1973). Cross- cultural research methods. New York: Wiley.

■ Bronowski, J. (1977). A sense of the future: Essays in natural philosophy. P. E. Ariotti with R. Bronowski (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

■ Bronowski, J. (1978). The origins of knowledge and imagination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

■ Brown, R. O. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

■ Brown, T. (1970). Lectures on the philosophy of the human mind. In R. Brown (Ed.), Between Hume and Mill: An anthology of British philosophy- 1749- 1843 (pp. 330-387). New York: Random House/Modern Library.

■ Bruner, J. S., J. Goodnow & G. Austin (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.

■ Calvin, W. H. (1990). The cerebral symphony: Seashore reﬂections on the structure of consciousness. New York: Bantam.

■ Campbell, J. (1982). Grammatical man: Information, entropy, language, and life. New York: Simon & Schuster.

■ Campbell, J. (1989). The improbable machine. New York: Simon & Schuster.

■ Carlyle, T. (1966). On heroes, hero- worship and the heroic in history. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. (Originally published in 1841.)

■ Carnap, R. (1959). The elimination of metaphysics through logical analysis of language [Ueberwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache]. In A. J. Ayer (Ed.), Logical positivism (pp. 60-81) A. Pap (Trans). New York: Free Press. (Originally published in 1932.)

■ Cassirer, E. (1946). Language and myth. New York: Harper and Brothers. Reprinted. New York: Dover Publications, 1953.

■ Cattell, R. B., & H. J. Butcher (1970). Creativity and personality. In P. E. Vernon (Ed.), Creativity. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.

■ Caudill, M., & C. Butler (1990). Naturally intelligent systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

■ Chandrasekaran, B. (1990). What kind of information processing is intelligence? A perspective on AI paradigms and a proposal. In D. Partridge & R. Wilks (Eds.), The foundations of artificial intelligence: A sourcebook (pp. 14-46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

■ Charniak, E., & McDermott, D. (1985). Introduction to artificial intelligence. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

■ Chase, W. G., & H. A. Simon (1988). The mind's eye in chess. In A. Collins & E. E. Smith (Eds.), Readings in cognitive science: A perspective from psychology and artificial intelligence (pp. 461-493). San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann.

■ Cheney, D. L., & R. M. Seyfarth (1990). How monkeys see the world: Inside the mind of another species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

■ Chi, M.T.H., R. Glaser & E. Rees (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 7-73). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

■ Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. Janua Linguarum.

■ Chomsky, N. (1964). A transformational approach to syntax. In J. A. Fodor & J. J. Katz (Eds.), The structure of language: Readings in the philosophy of lan guage (pp. 211-245). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

■ Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

■ Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and mind (enlarged ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

■ Chomsky, N. (1979). Language and responsibility. New York: Pantheon.

■ Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger Special Studies.

■ Churchland, P. (1979). Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.

■ Churchland, P. M. (1989). A neurocomputational perspective: The nature of mind and the structure of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

■ Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

■ Clark, A. (1996). Philosophical Foundations. In M. A. Boden (Ed.), Artificial in telligence (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.

■ Clark, H. H., & T. B. Carlson (1981). Context for comprehension. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 9, pp. 313-330). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

■ Clarke, A. C. (1984). Profiles of the future: An inquiry into the limits of the possible. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

■ Claxton, G. (1980). Cognitive psychology: A suitable case for what sort of treatment? In G. Claxton (Ed.), Cognitive psychology: New directions (pp. 1-25). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

■ Code, M. (1985). Order and organism. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

■ Collingwood, R. G. (1972). The idea of history. New York: Oxford University Press.

■ Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self- esteem. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

■ Copland, A. (1952). Music and imagination. London: Oxford University Press.

■ Coren, S. (1994). The intelligence of dogs. New York: Bantam Books.

■ Cottingham, J. (Ed.) (1996). Western philosophy: An anthology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

■ Cox, C. (1926). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

■ Craik, K.J.W. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

■ Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: HarperCollins.

■ Cronbach, L. J., & R. E. Snow (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York: Irvington. Paperback edition, 1981.

■ Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The evolving self. New York: Harper Perennial.

■ Culler, J. (1976). Ferdinand de Saussure. New York: Penguin Books.

■ Curtius, E. R. (1973). European literature and the Latin Middle Ages. W. R. Trask (Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

■ D'Alembert, J.L.R. (1963). Preliminary discourse to the encyclopedia of Diderot. R. N. Schwab (Trans.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

■ Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Avon.

■ Dampier, W. C. (1966). A history of modern science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

■ Darwin, C. (1911). The life and letters of Charles Darwin (Vol. 1). Francis Darwin (Ed.). New York: Appleton.

■ Davidson, D. (1970) Mental events. In L. Foster & J. W. Swanson (Eds.), Experience and theory (pp. 79-101). Amherst: University of Massachussetts Press.

■ Davies, P. (1995). About time: Einstein's unfinished revolution. New York: Simon & Schuster/Touchstone.

■ Davis, R., & J. J. King (1977). An overview of production systems. In E. Elcock & D. Michie (Eds.), Machine intelligence 8. Chichester, England: Ellis Horwood.

■ Davis, R., & D. B. Lenat (1982). Knowledge- based systems in artificial intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

■ Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype: The gene as the unit of selection. Oxford: W. H. Freeman.

■ deKleer, J., & J. S. Brown (1983). Assumptions and ambiguities in mechanistic mental models (1983). In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental modes (pp. 155-190). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

■ Dennett, D. C. (1978a). Brainstorms: Philosophical essays on mind and psychology. Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books.

■ Dennett, D. C. (1978b). Toward a cognitive theory of consciousness. In D. C. Dennett, Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology. Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books.

■ Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon & Schuster/Touchstone.

■ Descartes, R. (1897-1910). Traite de l'homme. In Oeuvres de Descartes (Vol. 11, pp. 119-215). Paris: Charles Adam & Paul Tannery. (Originally published in 1634.)

■ Descartes, R. (1950). Discourse on method. L. J. Laﬂeur (Trans.). New York: Liberal Arts Press. (Originally published in 1637.)

■ Descartes, R. (1951). Meditation on first philosophy. L. J. Laﬂeur (Trans.). New York: Liberal Arts Press. (Originally published in 1641.)

■ Descartes, R. (1955). The philosophical works of Descartes. E. S. Haldane and G.R.T. Ross (Trans.). New York: Dover. (Originally published in 1911 by Cambridge University Press.)

■ Descartes, R. (1967). Discourse on method (Pt. V). In E. S. Haldane and G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 1, pp. 106-118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1637.)

■ Descartes, R. (1970a). Discourse on method. In E. S. Haldane & G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 1, pp. 181-200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1637.)

■ Descartes, R. (1970b). Principles of philosophy. In E. S. Haldane & G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 1, pp. 178-291). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1644.)

■ Descartes, R. (1984). Meditations on first philosophy. In J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff & D. Murduch (Trans.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1641.)

■ Descartes, R. (1986). Meditations on first philosophy. J. Cottingham (Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1641 as Med itationes de prima philosophia.)

■ deWulf, M. (1956). An introduction to scholastic philosophy. Mineola, NY: Dover Books.

■ Dixon, N. F. (1981). Preconscious processing. London: Wiley.

■ Doyle, A. C. (1986). The Boscombe Valley mystery. In Sherlock Holmes: The com plete novels and stories (Vol. 1). New York: Bantam.

■ Dreyfus, H., & S. Dreyfus (1986). Mind over machine. New York: Free Press.

■ Dreyfus, H. L. (1972). What computers can't do: The limits of artificial intelligence (revised ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

■ Dreyfus, H. L., & S. E. Dreyfus (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: Free Press.

■ Edelman, G. M. (1992). Bright air, brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind. New York: Basic Books.

■ Ehrenzweig, A. (1967). The hidden order of art. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

■ Einstein, A., & L. Infeld (1938). The evolution of physics. New York: Simon & Schuster.

■ Eisenstein, S. (1947). Film sense. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

■ Everdell, W. R. (1997). The first moderns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

■ Eysenck, M. W. (1977). Human memory: Theory, research and individual difference. Oxford: Pergamon.

■ Eysenck, M. W. (1982). Attention and arousal: Cognition and performance. Berlin: Springer.

■ Eysenck, M. W. (1984). A handbook of cognitive psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

■ Fancher, R. E. (1979). Pioneers of psychology. New York: W. W. Norton.

■ Farrell, B. A. (1981). The standing of psychoanalysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

■ Feldman, D. H. (1980). Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

■ Fetzer, J. H. (1996). Philosophy and cognitive science (2nd ed.). New York: Paragon House.

■ Finke, R. A. (1990). Creative imagery: Discoveries and inventions in visualization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

■ Flanagan, O. (1991). The science of the mind. Cambridge MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

■ Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

■ Frege, G. (1972). Conceptual notation. T. W. Bynum (Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Originally published in 1879.)

■ Frege, G. (1979). Logic. In H. Hermes, F. Kambartel & F. Kaulbach (Eds.), Gottlob Frege: Posthumous writings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Originally published in 1879-1891.)

■ Freud, S. (1959). Creative writers and day-dreaming. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 9, pp. 143-153). London: Hogarth Press.

■ Freud, S. (1966). Project for a scientific psychology. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The stan dard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 1, pp. 295-398). London: Hogarth Press. (Originally published in 1950 as Aus den AnfaЁngen der Psychoanalyse, in London by Imago Publishing.)

■ Freud, S. (1976). Lecture 18-Fixation to traumas-the unconscious. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 16, p. 285). London: Hogarth Press.

■ Galileo, G. (1990). Il saggiatore [The assayer]. In S. Drake (Ed.), Discoveries and opinions of Galileo. New York: Anchor Books. (Originally published in 1623.)

■ Gassendi, P. (1970). Letter to Descartes. In "Objections and replies." In E. S. Haldane & G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 2, pp. 179-240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1641.)

■ Gazzaniga, M. S. (1988). Mind matters: How mind and brain interact to create our conscious lives. Boston: Houghton Mifﬂin in association with MIT Press/Bradford Books.

■ Genesereth, M. R., & N. J. Nilsson (1987). Logical foundations of artificial intelligence. Palo Alto, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

■ Ghiselin, B. (1952). The creative process. New York: Mentor.

■ Ghiselin, B. (1985). The creative process. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Originally published in 1952.)

■ Gilhooly, K. J. (1996). Thinking: Directed, undirected and creative (3rd ed.). London: Academic Press.

■ Glass, A. L., K. J. Holyoak & J. L. Santa (1979). Cognition. Reading, MA: AddisonWesley.

■ Goody, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

■ Gruber, H. E. (1980). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

■ Gruber, H. E., & S. Davis (1988). Inching our way up Mount Olympus: The evolving systems approach to creative thinking. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

■ Guthrie, E. R. (1972). The psychology of learning. New York: Harper. (Originally published in 1935.)

■ Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon Press.

■ Hadamard, J. (1945). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

■ Hand, D. J. (1985). Artificial intelligence and psychiatry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

■ Harris, M. (1981). The language myth. London: Duckworth.

■ Haugeland, J. (Ed.) (1981). Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

■ Haugeland, J. (1981a). The nature and plausibility of cognitivism. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence (pp. 243-281). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

■ Haugeland, J. (1981b). Semantic engines: An introduction to mind design. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence (pp. 1-34). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

■ Haugeland, J. (1985). Artificial intelligence: The very idea. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

■ Hawkes, T. (1977). Structuralism and semiotics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

■ Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organisation of behaviour. New York: Wiley.

■ Hebb, D. O. (1958). A textbook of psychology. Philadelphia: Saunders.

■ Hegel, G.W.F. (1910). The phenomenology of mind. J. B. Baille (Trans.). London: Sonnenschein. (Originally published as Phaenomenologie des Geistes, 1807.)

■ Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy. New York: Harper & Row.

■ Hempel, C. G. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall.

■ Herman, A. (1997). The idea of decline in Western history. New York: Free Press.

■ Herrnstein, R. J., & E. G. Boring (Eds.) (1965). A source book in the history of psy chology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

■ Herzmann, E. (1964). Mozart's creative process. In P. H. Lang (Ed.), The creative world of Mozart (pp. 17-30). London: Oldbourne Press.

■ Hilgard, E. R. (1957). Introduction to psychology. London: Methuen.

■ Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan. London: Crooke.

■ Hofstadter, D. R. (1979). Goedel, Escher, Bach: An eternal golden braid. New York: Basic Books.

■ Holliday, S. G., & M. J. Chandler (1986). Wisdom: Explorations in adult competence. Basel, Switzerland: Karger.

■ Horn, J. L. (1986). In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 3). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

■ Hull, C. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

■ Hume, D. (1955). An inquiry concerning human understanding. New York: Liberal Arts Press. (Originally published in 1748.)

■ Hume, D. (1975). An enquiry concerning human understanding. In L. A. SelbyBigge (Ed.), Hume's enquiries (3rd. ed., revised P. H. Nidditch). Oxford: Clarendon. (Spelling and punctuation revised.) (Originally published in 1748.)

■ Hume, D. (1978). A treatise of human nature. L. A. Selby-Bigge (Ed.), Hume's enquiries (3rd. ed., revised P. H. Nidditch). Oxford: Clarendon. (With some modifications of spelling and punctuation.) (Originally published in 1690.)

■ Hunt, E. (1973). The memory we must have. In R. C. Schank & K. M. Colby (Eds.), Computer models of thought and language. (pp. 343-371) San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

■ Husserl, E. (1960). Cartesian meditations. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

■ Inhelder, B., & J. Piaget (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books. (Originally published in 1955 as De la logique de l'enfant a` la logique de l'adolescent. [Paris: Presses Universitaire de France])

■ James, W. (1890a). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Dover Books.

■ James, W. (1890b). The principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt.

■ Jevons, W. S. (1900). The principles of science (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.

■ Johnson, G. (1986). Machinery of the mind: Inside the new science of artificial intelli gence. New York: Random House.

■ Johnson, M. L. (1988). Mind, language, machine. New York: St. Martin's Press.

■ Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Toward a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

■ Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1988). The computer and the mind: An introduction to cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

■ Jones, E. (1961). The life and work of Sigmund Freud. L. Trilling & S. Marcus (Eds.). London: Hogarth.

■ Jones, R. V. (1985). Complementarity as a way of life. In A. P. French & P. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Niels Bohr: A centenary volume. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

■ Kant, I. (1933). Critique of Pure Reason (2nd ed.). N. K. Smith (Trans.). London: Macmillan. (Originally published in 1781 as Kritik der reinen Vernunft.)

■ Kant, I. (1891). Solution of the general problems of the Prolegomena. In E. Belfort (Trans.), Kant's Prolegomena. London: Bell. (With minor modifications.) (Originally published in 1783.)

■ Katona, G. (1940). Organizing and memorizing: Studies in the psychology of learning and teaching. New York: Columbia University Press.

■ Kaufman, A. S. (1979). Intelligent testing with the WISC-R. New York: Wiley.

■ Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York: Arkana (Penguin).

■ Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought. In T. Mischel (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology. (pp. 151-235) New York: Academic Press.

■ KoЁhler, W. (1925). The mentality of apes. New York: Liveright.

■ KoЁhler, W. (1927). The mentality of apes (2nd ed.). Ella Winter (Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

■ KoЁhler, W. (1930). Gestalt psychology. London: G. Bell.

■ KoЁhler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright.

■ KoЁhler, W. (1969). The task of Gestalt psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

■ Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

■ Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

■ Langer, S. (1962). Philosophical sketches. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

■ Langley, P., H. A. Simon, G. L. Bradshaw & J. M. Zytkow (1987). Scientific dis covery: Computational explorations of the creative process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

■ Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior, the Hixon Symposium (pp. 112-146) New York: Wiley.

■ LeDoux, J. E., & W. Hirst (1986). Mind and brain: Dialogues in cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

■ Lehnert, W. (1978). The process of question answering. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

■ Leiber, J. (1991). Invitation to cognitive science. Oxford: Blackwell.

■ Lenat, D. B., & G. Harris (1978). Designing a rule system that searches for scientific discoveries. In D. A. Waterman & F. Hayes-Roth (Eds.), Pattern directed inference systems (pp. 25-52) New York: Academic Press.

■ Levenson, T. (1995). Measure for measure: A musical history of science. New York: Touchstone. (Originally published in 1994.)

■ Leґvi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural anthropology. C. Jacobson & B. Grundfest Schoepf (Trans.). New York: Basic Books. (Originally published in 1958.)

■ Levine, M. W., & J. M. Schefner (1981). Fundamentals of sensation and perception. London: Addison-Wesley.

■ Lewis, C. I. (1946). An analysis of knowledge and valuation. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.

■ Lighthill, J. (1972). A report on artificial intelligence. Unpublished manuscript, Science Research Council.

■ Lipman, M., A. M. Sharp & F. S. Oscanyan (1980). Philosophy in the classroom. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

■ Lippmann, W. (1965). Public opinion. New York: Free Press. (Originally published in 1922.)

■ Locke, J. (1956). An essay concerning human understanding. Chicago: Henry Regnery Co. (Originally published in 1690.)

■ Locke, J. (1975). An essay concerning human understanding. P. H. Nidditch (Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon. (Originally published in 1690.) (With spelling and punctuation modernized and some minor modifications of phrasing.)

■ Lopate, P. (1994). The art of the personal essay. New York: Doubleday/Anchor Books.

■ Lorimer, F. (1929). The growth of reason. London: Kegan Paul. Machlup, F., & U. Mansfield (Eds.) (1983). The study of information. New York: Wiley.

■ Manguel, A. (1996). A history of reading. New York: Viking.

■ Margolis, H. (1987). Patterns, thinking, and cognition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

■ Markey, J. F. (1928). The symbolic process. London: Kegan Paul.

■ Martin, R. M. (1969). On Ziff's "Natural and formal languages." In S. Hook (Ed.), Language and philosophy: A symposium (pp. 249-263). New York: New York University Press.

■ Mazlish, B. (1993). The fourth discontinuity: the co- evolution of humans and machines. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

■ McCarthy, J., & P. J. Hayes (1969). Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In B. Meltzer & D. Michie (Eds.), Machine intelligence 4. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

■ McClelland, J. L., D. E. Rumelhart & G. E. Hinton (1986). The appeal of parallel distributed processing. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the mi crostructure of cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 3-40). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/ Bradford Books.

■ McCorduck, P. (1979). Machines who think. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

■ McLaughlin, T. (1970). Music and communication. London: Faber & Faber.

■ Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review 69, 431-436.

■ Meehl, P. E., & C. J. Golden (1982). Taxometric methods. In Kendall, P. C., & Butcher, J. N. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 127-182). New York: Wiley.

■ Mehler, J., E.C.T. Walker & M. Garrett (Eds.) (1982). Perspectives on mental rep resentation: Experimental and theoretical studies of cognitive processes and ca pacities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

■ Mill, J. S. (1900). A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive: Being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific investigation. London: Longmans, Green.

■ Miller, G. A. (1979, June). A very personal history. Talk to the Cognitive Science Workshop, Cambridge, MA.

■ Miller, J. (1983). States of mind. New York: Pantheon Books.

■ Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211-277). New York: McGrawHill.

■ Minsky, M., & S. Papert (1973). Artificial intelligence. Condon Lectures, Oregon State System of Higher Education, Eugene, Oregon.

■ Minsky, M. L. (1986). The society of mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.

■ Mischel, T. (1976). Psychological explanations and their vicissitudes. In J. K. Cole & W. J. Arnold (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on motivation (Vol. 23). Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.

■ Morford, M.P.O., & R. J. Lenardon (1995). Classical mythology (5th ed.). New York: Longman.

■ Murdoch, I. (1954). Under the net. New York: Penguin.

■ Nagel, E. (1959). Methodological issues in psychoanalytic theory. In S. Hook (Ed.), Psychoanalysis, scientific method, and philosophy: A symposium. New York: New York University Press.

■ Nagel, T. (1979). Mortal questions. London: Cambridge University Press.

■ Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

■ Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

■ Neisser, U. (1972). Changing conceptions of imagery. In P. W. Sheehan (Ed.), The function and nature of imagery (pp. 233-251). London: Academic Press.

■ Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

■ Neisser, U. (1978). Memory: What are the important questions? In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 3-24). London: Academic Press.

■ Neisser, U. (1979). The concept of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & D. K. Detterman (Eds.), Human intelligence: Perspectives on its theory and measurement (pp. 179-190). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

■ Nersessian, N. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science (pp. 3-44). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

■ Newell, A. (1973a). Artificial intelligence and the concept of mind. In R. C. Schank & K. M. Colby (Eds.), Computer models of thought and language (pp. 1-60). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

■ Newell, A. (1973b). You can't play 20 questions with nature and win. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 283-310). New York: Academic Press.

■ Newell, A., & H. A. Simon (1963). GPS: A program that simulates human thought. In E. A. Feigenbaum & J. Feldman (Eds.), Computers and thought (pp. 279-293). New York & McGraw-Hill.

■ Newell, A., & H. A. Simon (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

■ Nietzsche, F. (1966). Beyond good and evil. W. Kaufmann (Trans.). New York: Vintage. (Originally published in 1885.)

■ Nilsson, N. J. (1971). Problem- solving methods in artificial intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

■ Nussbaum, M. C. (1978). Aristotle's Princeton University Press. De Motu Anamalium. Princeton, NJ:

■ Oersted, H. C. (1920). Thermo-electricity. In Kirstine Meyer (Ed.), H. C. Oersted, Natuurvidenskabelige Skrifter (Vol. 2). Copenhagen: n.p. (Originally published in 1830 in The Edinburgh encyclopaedia.)

■ Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen.

■ Onians, R. B. (1954). The origins of European thought. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

■ Osgood, C. E. (1960). Method and theory in experimental psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. (Originally published in 1953.)

■ Osgood, C. E. (1966). Language universals and psycholinguistics. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (2nd ed., pp. 299-322). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

■ Palmer, R. E. (1969). Hermeneutics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

■ Peirce, C. S. (1934). Some consequences of four incapacities-Man, a sign. In C. Hartsborne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Saunders Peirce (Vol. 5, pp. 185-189). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

■ Penfield, W. (1959). In W. Penfield & L. Roberts, Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

■ Penrose, R. (1994). Shadows of the mind: A search for the missing science of conscious ness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

■ Perkins, D. N. (1981). The mind's best work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

■ Peterfreund, E. (1986). The heuristic approach to psychoanalytic therapy. In

■ J. Reppen (Ed.), Analysts at work, (pp. 127-144). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.

■ Piaget, J. (1952). The origin of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press. (Originally published in 1936.)

■ Piaget, J. (1954). Le langage et les opeґrations intellectuelles. Proble` mes de psycho linguistique. Symposium de l'Association de Psychologie Scientifique de Langue Francёaise. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

■ Piaget, J. (1977). Problems of equilibration. In H. E. Gruber & J. J. Voneche (Eds.), The essential Piaget (pp. 838-841). London: Routlege & Kegan Paul. (Originally published in 1975 as L'eґquilibration des structures cognitives [Paris: Presses Universitaires de France].)

■ Piaget, J., & B. Inhelder. (1973). Memory and intelligence. New York: Basic Books.

■ Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: Morrow.

■ Pinker, S. (1996). Facts about human language relevant to its evolution. In J.-P. Changeux & J. Chavaillon (Eds.), Origins of the human brain. A symposium of the Fyssen foundation (pp. 262-283). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Planck, M. (1949). Scientific autobiography and other papers. F. Gaynor (Trans.). New York: Philosophical Library.

■ Planck, M. (1990). Wissenschaftliche Selbstbiographie. W. Berg (Ed.). Halle, Germany: Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina.

■ Plato (1892). Meno. In The Dialogues of Plato (B. Jowett, Trans.; Vol. 2). New York: Clarendon. (Originally published circa 380 B.C.)

■ Poincareґ, H. (1913). Mathematical creation. In The foundations of science. G. B. Halsted (Trans.). New York: Science Press.

■ Poincareґ, H. (1921). The foundations of science: Science and hypothesis, the value of science, science and method. G. B. Halstead (Trans.). New York: Science Press.

■ Poincareґ, H. (1929). The foundations of science: Science and hypothesis, the value of science, science and method. New York: Science Press.

■ Poincareґ, H. (1952). Science and method. F. Maitland (Trans.) New York: Dover.

■ Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

■ Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

■ Popper, K. (1968). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Harper & Row/Basic Books.

■ Popper, K., & J. Eccles (1977). The self and its brain. New York: Springer-Verlag.

■ Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.

■ Putnam, H. (1975). Mind, language and reality: Philosophical papers (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

■ Putnam, H. (1987). The faces of realism. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.

■ Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1981). The imagery debate: Analog media versus tacit knowledge. In N. Block (Ed.), Imagery (pp. 151-206). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

■ Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984). Computation and cognition: Towards a foundation for cog nitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

■ Quillian, M. R. (1968). Semantic memory. In M. Minsky (Ed.), Semantic information processing (pp. 216-260). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

■ Quine, W.V.O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

■ Rabbitt, P.M.A., & S. Dornic (Eds.). Attention and performance (Vol. 5). London: Academic Press.

■ Rawlins, G.J.E. (1997). Slaves of the Machine: The quickening of computer technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

■ Reid, T. (1970). An inquiry into the human mind on the principles of common sense. In R. Brown (Ed.), Between Hume and Mill: An anthology of British philosophy- 1749- 1843 (pp. 151-178). New York: Random House/Modern Library.

■ Reitman, W. (1970). What does it take to remember? In D. A. Norman (Ed.), Models of human memory (pp. 470-510). London: Academic Press.

■ Ricoeur, P. (1974). Structure and hermeneutics. In D. I. Ihde (Ed.), The conﬂict of interpretations: Essays in hermeneutics (pp. 27-61). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

■ Robinson, D. N. (1986). An intellectual history of psychology. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

■ Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

■ Rosch, E. (1977). Human categorization. In N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in cross cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1-49) London: Academic Press.

■ Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

■ Rosch, E., & B. B. Lloyd (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

■ Rose, S. (1970). The chemistry of life. Baltimore: Penguin Books.

■ Rose, S. (1976). The conscious brain (updated ed.). New York: Random House.

■ Rose, S. (1993). The making of memory: From molecules to mind. New York: Anchor Books. (Originally published in 1992)

■ Roszak, T. (1994). The cult of information: A neo- Luddite treatise on high- tech, artificial intelligence, and the true art of thinking (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.

■ Royce, J. R., & W. W. Rozeboom (Eds.) (1972). The psychology of knowing. New York: Gordon & Breach.

■ Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Introduction to human information processing. New York: Wiley.

■ Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. Bruce & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

■ Rumelhart, D. E., & J. L. McClelland (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

■ Rumelhart, D. E., P. Smolensky, J. L. McClelland & G. E. Hinton (1986). Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models. In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing (Vol. 2, pp. 7-57). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

■ Russell, B. (1927). An outline of philosophy. London: G. Allen & Unwin.

■ Russell, B. (1961). History of Western philosophy. London: George Allen & Unwin.

■ Russell, B. (1965). How I write. In Portraits from memory and other essays. London: Allen & Unwin.

■ Russell, B. (1992). In N. Griffin (Ed.), The selected letters of Bertrand Russell (Vol. 1), The private years, 1884- 1914. Boston: Houghton Mifﬂin. Ryecroft, C. (1966). Psychoanalysis observed. London: Constable.

■ Sagan, C. (1978). The dragons of Eden: Speculations on the evolution of human intel ligence. New York: Ballantine Books.

■ Salthouse, T. A. (1992). Expertise as the circumvention of human processing limitations. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 172-194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

■ Sanford, A. J. (1987). The mind of man: Models of human understanding. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

■ Sapir, E. (1921). Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.

■ Sapir, E. (1964). Culture, language, and personality. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Originally published in 1941.)

■ Sapir, E. (1985). The status of linguistics as a science. In D. G. Mandelbaum (Ed.), Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture and personality (pp. 160166). Berkeley: University of California Press. (Originally published in 1929).

■ Scardmalia, M., & C. Bereiter (1992). Literate expertise. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 172-194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

■ Schafer, R. (1954). Psychoanalytic interpretation in Rorschach testing. New York: Grune & Stratten.

■ Schank, R. C. (1973). Identification of conceptualizations underlying natural language. In R. C. Schank & K. M. Colby (Eds.), Computer models of thought and language (pp. 187-248). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

■ Schank, R. C. (1976). The role of memory in language processing. In C. N. Cofer (Ed.), The structure of human memory. (pp. 162-189) San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

■ Schank, R. C. (1986). Explanation patterns: Understanding mechanically and creatively. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

■ Schank, R. C., & R. P. Abelson (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

■ SchroЁdinger, E. (1951). Science and humanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

■ Searle, J. R. (1981a). Minds, brains, and programs. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence (pp. 282-306). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

■ Searle, J. R. (1981b). Minds, brains and programs. In D. Hofstadter & D. Dennett (Eds.), The mind's I (pp. 353-373). New York: Basic Books.

■ Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality. New York: Cambridge University Press.

■ Serres, M. (1982). The origin of language: Biology, information theory, and thermodynamics. M. Anderson (Trans.). In J. V. Harari & D. F. Bell (Eds.), Hermes: Literature, science, philosophy (pp. 71-83). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

■ Simon, H. A. (1966). Scientific discovery and the psychology of problem solving. In R. G. Colodny (Ed.), Mind and cosmos: Essays in contemporary science and philosophy (pp. 22-40). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

■ Simon, H. A. (1979). Models of thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

■ Simon, H. A. (1989). The scientist as a problem solver. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert Simon. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

■ Simon, H. A., & C. Kaplan (1989). Foundations of cognitive science. In M. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 1-47). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

■ Simonton, D. K. (1988). Creativity, leadership and chance. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

■ Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.

■ Smith, E. E. (1988). Concepts and thought. In J. Sternberg & E. E. Smith (Eds.), The psychology of human thought (pp. 19-49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

■ Smith, E. E. (1990). Thinking: Introduction. In D. N. Osherson & E. E. Smith (Eds.), Thinking. An invitation to cognitive science. (Vol. 3, pp. 1-2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

■ Socrates. (1958). Meno. In E. H. Warmington & P. O. Rouse (Eds.), Great dialogues of Plato W.H.D. Rouse (Trans.). New York: New American Library. (Original publication date unknown.)

■ Solso, R. L. (1974). Theories of retrieval. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology. Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

■ Spencer, H. (1896). The principles of psychology. New York: Appleton-CenturyCrofts.

■ Steiner, G. (1975). After Babel: Aspects of language and translation. New York: Oxford University Press.

■ Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

■ Sternberg, R. J. (1994). Intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg, Thinking and problem solving. San Diego: Academic Press.

■ Sternberg, R. J., & J. E. Davidson (1985). Cognitive development in gifted and talented. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O'Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented (pp. 103-135). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

■ Storr, A. (1993). The dynamics of creation. New York: Ballantine Books. (Originally published in 1972.)

■ Stumpf, S. E. (1994). Philosophy: History and problems (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

■ Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York: Random House/Vintage Books.

■ Thorndike, E. L. (1906). Principles of teaching. New York: A. G. Seiler.

■ Thorndike, E. L. (1970). Animal intelligence: Experimental studies. Darien, CT: Hafner Publishing Co. (Originally published in 1911.)

■ Titchener, E. B. (1910). A textbook of psychology. New York: Macmillan.

■ Titchener, E. B. (1914). A primer of psychology. New York: Macmillan.

■ Toulmin, S. (1957). The philosophy of science. London: Hutchinson.

■ Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organisation of memory. London: Academic Press.

■ Turing, A. (1946). In B. E. Carpenter & R. W. Doran (Eds.), ACE reports of 1946 and other papers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

■ Turkle, S. (1984). Computers and the second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon & Schuster.

■ Tyler, S. A. (1978). The said and the unsaid: Mind, meaning, and culture. New York: Academic Press.

■ van Heijenoort (Ed.) (1967). From Frege to Goedel. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

■ Varela, F. J. (1984). The creative circle: Sketches on the natural history of circularity. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality (pp. 309-324). New York: W. W. Norton.

■ Voltaire (1961). On the Penseґs of M. Pascal. In Philosophical letters (pp. 119-146). E. Dilworth (Trans.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

■ Wagman, M. (1991a). Artificial intelligence and human cognition: A theoretical inter comparison of two realms of intellect. Westport, CT: Praeger.

■ Wagman, M. (1991b). Cognitive science and concepts of mind: Toward a general theory of human and artificial intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.

■ Wagman, M. (1993). Cognitive psychology and artificial intelligence: Theory and re search in cognitive science. Westport, CT: Praeger.

■ Wagman, M. (1995). The sciences of cognition: Theory and research in psychology and artificial intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.

■ Wagman, M. (1996). Human intellect and cognitive science: Toward a general unified theory of intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.

■ Wagman, M. (1997a). Cognitive science and the symbolic operations of human and artificial intelligence: Theory and research into the intellective processes. Westport, CT: Praeger.

■ Wagman, M. (1997b). The general unified theory of intelligence: Central conceptions and specific application to domains of cognitive science. Westport, CT: Praeger.

■ Wagman, M. (1998a). Cognitive science and the mind- body problem: From philosophy to psychology to artificial intelligence to imaging of the brain. Westport, CT: Praeger.

■ Wagman, M. (1998b). Language and thought in humans and computers: Theory and research in psychology, artificial intelligence, and neural science. Westport, CT: Praeger.

■ Wagman, M. (1998c). The ultimate objectives of artificial intelligence: Theoretical and research foundations, philosophical and psychological implications. Westport, CT: Praeger.

■ Wagman, M. (1999). The human mind according to artificial intelligence: Theory, re search, and implications. Westport, CT: Praeger.

■ Wagman, M. (2000). Scientific discovery processes in humans and computers: Theory and research in psychology and artificial intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.

■ Wall, R. (1972). Introduction to mathematical linguistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

■ Wallas, G. (1926). The Art of Thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.

■ Wason, P. (1977). Self contradictions. In P. Johnson-Laird & P. Wason (Eds.), Thinking: Readings in cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

■ Wason, P. C., & P. N. Johnson-Laird. (1972). Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

■ Watson, J. (1930). Behaviorism. New York: W. W. Norton.

■ Watzlawick, P. (1984). Epilogue. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality. New York: W. W. Norton, 1984.

■ Weinberg, S. (1977). The first three minutes: A modern view of the origin of the uni verse. New York: Basic Books.

■ Weisberg, R. W. (1986). Creativity: Genius and other myths. New York: W. H. Freeman.

■ Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer power and human reason: From judgment to cal culation. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

■ Wertheimer, M. (1945). Productive thinking. New York: Harper & Bros.

■ Whitehead, A. N. (1925). Science and the modern world. New York: Macmillan.

■ Whorf, B. L. (1956). In J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

■ Whyte, L. L. (1962). The unconscious before Freud. New York: Anchor Books.

■ Wiener, N. (1954). The human use of human beings. Boston: Houghton Mifﬂin.

■ Wiener, N. (1964). God & Golem, Inc.: A comment on certain points where cybernetics impinges on religion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

■ Winograd, T. (1972). Understanding natural language. New York: Academic Press.

■ Winston, P. H. (1987). Artificial intelligence: A perspective. In E. L. Grimson & R. S. Patil (Eds.), AI in the 1980s and beyond (pp. 1-12). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

■ Winston, P. H. (Ed.) (1975). The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGrawHill.

■ Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

■ Wittgenstein, L. (1958). The blue and brown books. New York: Harper Colophon.

■ Woods, W. A. (1975). What's in a link: Foundations for semantic networks. In D. G. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representations and understanding: Studies in cognitive science (pp. 35-84). New York: Academic Press.

■ Woodworth, R. S. (1938). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt; London: Methuen (1939).

■ Wundt, W. (1904). Principles of physiological psychology (Vol. 1). E. B. Titchener (Trans.). New York: Macmillan.

■ Wundt, W. (1907). Lectures on human and animal psychology. J. E. Creighton & E. B. Titchener (Trans.). New York: Macmillan.

■ Young, J. Z. (1978). Programs of the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.

■ Ziman, J. (1978). Reliable knowledge: An exploration of the grounds for belief in science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Bibliography
20 Psychology

   1) The Knowledge of Ourselves

   We come therefore now to that knowledge whereunto the ancient oracle directeth us, which is the knowledge of ourselves; which deserveth the more accurate handling, by how much it toucheth us more nearly. This knowledge, as it is the end and term of natural philosophy in the intention of man, so notwithstanding it is but a portion of natural philosophy in the continent of nature.... [W]e proceed to human philosophy or Humanity, which hath two parts: the one considereth man segregate, or distributively; the other congregate, or in society. So as Human philosophy is either Simple and Particular, or Conjugate and Civil. Humanity Particular consisteth of the same parts whereof man consisteth; that is, of knowledges which respect the Body, and of knowledges that respect the Mind... how the one discloseth the other and how the one worketh upon the other... [:] the one is honored with the inquiry of Aristotle, and the other of Hippocrates. (Bacon, 1878, pp. 236-237)

   2) As a Science, Psychology Is Distinct

   The claims of Psychology to rank as a distinct science are... not smaller but greater than those of any other science. If its phenomena are contemplated objectively, merely as nervo-muscular adjustments by which the higher organisms from moment to moment adapt their actions to environing co-existences and sequences, its degree of specialty, even then, entitles it to a separate place. The moment the element of feeling, or consciousness, is used to interpret nervo-muscular adjustments as thus exhibited in the living beings around, objective Psychology acquires an additional, and quite exceptional, distinction. (Spencer, 1896, p. 141)

   3) Psychology Can Never Be an Exact Natural Science

   Kant once declared that psychology was incapable of ever raising itself to the rank of an exact natural science. The reasons that he gives... have often been repeated in later times. In the first place, Kant says, psychology cannot become an exact science because mathematics is inapplicable to the phenomena of the internal sense; the pure internal perception, in which mental phenomena must be constructed,-time,-has but one dimension. In the second place, however, it cannot even become an experimental science, because in it the manifold of internal observation cannot be arbitrarily varied,-still less, another thinking subject be submitted to one's experiments, comformably to the end in view; moreover, the very fact of observation means alteration of the observed object. (Wundt, 1904, p. 6)

   4) How a " Mathematical" Psychology May Be Realized in Practice

   It is [Gustav] Fechner's service to have found and followed the true way; to have shown us how a "mathematical psychology" may, within certain limits, be realized in practice.... He was the first to show how Herbart's idea of an "exact psychology" might be turned to practical account. (Wundt, 1904, pp. 6-7)

   5) The Rights of Psychology as Science

   "Mind," "intellect," "reason," "understanding," etc. are concepts... that existed before the advent of any scientific psychology. The fact that the naive consciousness always and everywhere points to internal experience as a special source of knowledge, may, therefore, be accepted for the moment as sufficient testimony to the rights of psychology as science.... "Mind," will accordingly be the subject, to which we attribute all the separate facts of internal observation as predicates. The subject itself is determined p. 17) wholly and exclusively by its predicates. (Wundt, 1904,

   6) The Study of Animal Psychology

   The study of animal psychology may be approached from two different points of view. We may set out from the notion of a kind of comparative physiology of mind, a universal history of the development of mental life in the organic world. Or we may make human psychology the principal object of investigation. Then, the expressions of mental life in animals will be taken into account only so far as they throw light upon the evolution of consciousness in man.... Human psychology... may confine itself altogether to man, and generally has done so to far too great an extent. There are plenty of psychological text-books from which you would hardly gather that there was any other conscious life than the human. (Wundt, 1907, pp. 340-341)

   7) The Behaviorist's Formulation

   The Behaviorist began his own formulation of the problem of psychology by sweeping aside all medieval conceptions. He dropped from his scientific vocabulary all subjective terms such as sensation, perception, image, desire, purpose, and even thinking and emotion as they were subjectively defined. (Watson, 1930, pp. 5-6)

   8) Man Is a Microcosm

   According to the medieval classification of the sciences, psychology is merely a chapter of special physics, although the most important chapter; for man is a microcosm; he is the central figure of the universe. (deWulf, 1956, p. 125)

   9) Brief Overview of Psychology's History

   At the beginning of this century the prevailing thesis in psychology was Associationism.... Behavior proceeded by the stream of associations: each association produced its successors, and acquired new attachments with the sensations arriving from the environment.

   In the first decade of the century a reaction developed to this doctrine through the work of the Wurzburg school. Rejecting the notion of a completely self-determining stream of associations, it introduced the task ( Aufgabe) as a necessary factor in describing the process of thinking. The task gave direction to thought. A noteworthy innovation of the Wurzburg school was the use of systematic introspection to shed light on the thinking process and the contents of consciousness. The result was a blend of mechanics and phenomenalism, which gave rise in turn to two divergent antitheses, Behaviorism and the Gestalt movement. The behavioristic reaction insisted that introspection was a highly unstable, subjective procedure.... Behaviorism reformulated the task of psychology as one of explaining the response of organisms as a function of the stimuli impinging upon them and measuring both objectively. However, Behaviorism accepted, and indeed reinforced, the mechanistic assumption that the connections between stimulus and response were formed and maintained as simple, determinate functions of the environment.

   The Gestalt reaction took an opposite turn. It rejected the mechanistic nature of the associationist doctrine but maintained the value of phenomenal observation. In many ways it continued the Wurzburg school's insistence that thinking was more than association-thinking has direction given to it by the task or by the set of the subject. Gestalt psychology elaborated this doctrine in genuinely new ways in terms of holistic principles of organization.

   Today psychology lives in a state of relatively stable tension between the poles of Behaviorism and Gestalt psychology.... (Newell & Simon, 1963, pp. 279-280)

    10) Psychological Research Is Not Building toward Systematic Clarity

   As I examine the fate of our oppositions, looking at those already in existence as guide to how they fare and shape the course of science, it seems to me that clarity is never achieved. Matters simply become muddier and muddier as we go down through time. Thus, far from providing the rungs of a ladder by which psychology gradually climbs to clarity, this form of conceptual structure leads rather to an ever increasing pile of issues, which we weary of or become diverted from, but never really settle. (Newell, 1973b, pp. 288-289)

    11) Psychology as a Scientific Discipline

   The subject matter of psychology is as old as reﬂection. Its broad practical aims are as dated as human societies. Human beings, in any period, have not been indifferent to the validity of their knowledge, unconcerned with the causes of their behavior or that of their prey and predators. Our distant ancestors, no less than we, wrestled with the problems of social organization, child rearing, competition, authority, individual differences, personal safety. Solving these problems required insights-no matter how untutored-into the psychological dimensions of life. Thus, if we are to follow the convention of treating psychology as a young discipline, we must have in mind something other than its subject matter. We must mean that it is young in the sense that physics was young at the time of Archimedes or in the sense that geometry was "founded" by Euclid and "fathered" by Thales. Sailing vessels were launched long before Archimedes discovered the laws of bouyancy [ sic], and pillars of identical circumference were constructed before anyone knew that C IID. We do not consider the ship builders and stone cutters of antiquity physicists and geometers. Nor were the ancient cave dwellers psychologists merely because they rewarded the good conduct of their children. The archives of folk wisdom contain a remarkable collection of achievements, but craft-no matter how perfected-is not science, nor is a litany of successful accidents a discipline. If psychology is young, it is young as a scientific discipline but it is far from clear that psychology has attained this status. (Robinson, 1986, p. 12)

Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Psychology

Страницы

См. также в других словарях:

Mind control — (also known as brainwashing, coercive persuasion, mind abuse, thought control, or thought reform) refers to a process in which a group or individual systematically uses unethically manipulative methods to persuade others to conform to the wishes… … Wikipedia
Scientific imperialism — is a term that appears to have been coined by Dr Ellis T Powell when addressing the Commonwealth Club of Canada on 8 September 1920. Though he defined imperialism as the sense of arbitrary and capricious domination over the bodies and souls of… … Wikipedia
Scientific racism — denotes the use of scientific, or ostensibly scientific, findings and methods to support or validate racist attitudes and worldviews. It is based on belief in the existence and significance of racial categories, but extends this into a hierarchy… … Wikipedia
Mind and Life Institute — Type Non profit Founded 1990 Website http://www.mindandlife.org/in … Wikipedia
Mind Hacks — Mind Hacks: Tips and Tricks for Using Your Brain is a book using cognitive neuroscience to present experiments, tricks, and tips related to aspects of the brain by Tom Stafford and Matt Webb. The book was published by O Reilly in November 2004 as … Wikipedia
Mind And Life Institute — Le Mind and Life Institute (français : l Institut Esprit et Vie ), a pour but de favoriser un apport mutuel entre le bouddhisme et la science. C est une association à but non lucratif qui s attache à explorer la relation de la science et du… … Wikipédia en Français
Mind and Life Institute — Contexte général Fiche d’identité Fondateur R. Adam Engle, Francisco Varela Forme juridique … Wikipédia en Français
Mind and life institute — Le Mind and Life Institute (français : l Institut Esprit et Vie ), a pour but de favoriser un apport mutuel entre le bouddhisme et la science. C est une association à but non lucratif qui s attache à explorer la relation de la science et du… … Wikipédia en Français
Scientific realism — is, at the most general level, the view that the world described by science is the real world, as it is, independent of what we might take it to be. Within philosophy of science, it is often framed as an answer to the question what does the… … Wikipedia
Mind transfer in fiction — Mind transfer is a common theme in science fiction. The idea is very briefly mentioned in Isaac Asimov s 1956 short story The Last Question : One by one Man fused with AC, each physical body losing its mental identity in a manner that was somehow … Wikipedia
Scientific skepticism — or rational skepticism (also spelled scepticism), sometimes referred to as skeptical inquiry, is a scientific or practical, epistemological position in which one questions the veracity of claims lacking empirical evidence. In practice, the term… … Wikipedia

Словари и энциклопедии на Академике

Перевод: с английского на все языки

scientific mind

См. также в других словарях:

Поделиться ссылкой на выделенное

Словари и энциклопедии на Академике

Перевод: с английского на все языки

scientific mind

См. также в других словарях:

Поделиться ссылкой на выделенное

Прямая ссылка: